World views
Modo forecasts a 'low' case and a 'high' case for different risk appetites.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0006d/0006df7031a4990c169563967c5c0146c110b7bd" alt=""
The low case assumes more conservative fundamentals & battery dispatch
- Slow the retirement of unabated gas using more conservative carbon de-rating factors in the future capacity market.
- Apply a 15% reduction to gas and carbon pricing along the curve which reduces power prices and spreads.
- Offshore wind has a more conservative buildout, reaching 65GW by 2050 (instead of 89GW in our central scenario) because none of the prospective floating wind sites come online.
- More, cheaper Demand Side Response, acting as a competitor to battery energy storage.
- Reduce battery dispatch rates in the Balancing Mechanism due to a slower roll out of software updates in the open balancing platform (see below)
- Reduce the revenue of optimised intraday actions by 20% to account for poorer capture of continuous intraday price opportunities.
- Assume the asset is performing less well, compared to the rest of the battery storage fleet: use the 25th percentile of the 1h or 2h Modo Benchmark for the calibration factor (as opposed to the median in the central case)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5dc1/b5dc1c2eb98794b2233cbb60a456fb4aad3a8a01" alt="Low case offshore wind buildout (v3.2)"
Low case offshore wind buildout (v3.2)
The high case assumes more optimistic battery dispatch
- Increase Balancing Mechanism dispatch by assuming that the competition from other BM units is reduced by half.
- Increase the revenue of optimised intraday actions by 20% to account for better capture of continuous intraday price opportunities.
- Assume the asset is performing well compared to the rest of the battery storage fleet: use the 75 percentile of the 1h or 2h Modo Benchmark for determining the calibration factors (as opposed to the median in the central case).
Updated 19 days ago