FAQ: Network Charges
- Do you consider Distribution Use of System charges in the revenue forecast?
- What impact do line losses have?
Do you consider Distribution Use of System charges in the revenue forecast?
We do not include Distribution Use of System (DUoS) charges in our revenue forecasts. This is because the majority of battery sites are connected at EHV on the distrbution networks. DUoS rates are very close to 0 for these sites.
We do not model fixed costs in our revenue forecast - like fixed DUoS or standing charges. Batteries are exempt from most of these costs.
If you have a LV or HV site, we are able to consider DUoS charges in a custom run. Please discuss this with your account manager and they'll be able to advise on the inputs required.
What impact do line losses have?
Transmission Loss Multipliers (TLMs) apply to transmission-connected assets.
Energy accounts are settled at the Notional Balancing Point (NBP). Energy is lost due to transmission losses from the point that it is generated to the Notional Balancing Point. For assets at lower voltages (such as those embedded in the distribution networks), the power has to travel through more of the network to get to the NBP - so the losses are higher.
They are regional (there are 14 zones corresponding to each Distribution Network or GSP group) and time-of-use dependent. There are two types of losses: Transmission Loss Multipliers (TLMs) and distribution level losses (D-loss). Typical values for these:
- TLMs ~ 1%
- D-Losses ~2%
They also depend on the voltage level of the asset in question. Usually, multipliers are higher overnight than during the peaks. They can be negative as well as positive. The TLM calculation attributes part of the transmission losses to generation and part to demand: there is a Generation/Demand split (currently, 45%).
Further explanation and example calculation for TLMs is given here.
What do Transmission Loss Multipliers mean for storage?
Transmission-connected assets will be subject to TLMs only and not D-Losses.
Most batteries connected at the distribution level will be connected at EHV - and the D-Losses will be minor (less than the 2% quoted above).
Below is an example calculation of TLMs for a charge and discharge action in the summer in Northern Scotland. We import 100MWh/88% (to account for battery efficiency) at 4 am when the energy rate is £10/MWh. We export 100MW at 5 pm at a rate of £100/MWh.
TLM example | Energy Price £/MWh | Metered Volume | G/D split | TLF (zone 14, Summer) | Average Transmission Loss |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charge (demand) | 10 | -100MWh / 0.88 = -113.6MWh | (100-45)% | -0.01471 | 2% |
Discharge (generation) | 100 | 100MWh | 45% | -0.01471 | 2% |
These example prices are lifted from the National Grid ESO TLM guidance document
Example of energy generation revenue at NBP
= Energy Tariff x (Metered Volume x TLM)
= Energy Tariff x Metered Volume x (1 +TLF + Gen Loss Adjustment)
= 100 x 100 x [1 + (-0.01471) + (–1 x 2% x 45%)]
= 100 x 100 x 0.97629
= £9,762.90
Example of energy demand cost at NBP
= Energy Tariff x (Metered Volume x TLM)
= Energy Tariff x Metered Volume x (1 +TLF + Demand Loss Adjustment)
= 10 x 113.6 x [1 + (-0.01471) + 1 x 2% x (1-45%)]
= 10 x 113.6 x 1.02571
= £1165.20
The Modo Forecast doesn't take into account Transmission Loss Multipliers.
Users should apply the relevant loss multiplier to their site to account for them.
TNUoS charges are calculated using metered volumes, not loss-adjusted volumes.
Using the above example, instead of
£100/MWh x 100MWh - £10/MWh x 113.6MWh = £8864 profit
We have
£9762.90 - £1165.20 = £8597.70 profit
I.e. a difference of around 3% uplift.
Updated about 2 months ago